Argument: the right dating age

 Thesis statement:

·         It should be okay to date someone that’s 2 or 3 years younger or older than the other person.

Reason 1: 

·         The reason why would be because, if there was a problem with dating someone that would be 2 or 3 years of age, then there would be a set law that you can’t date under or above someone’s age by 4 or more years.

o   Commentary 1: the government and about 52% of the United States would say they wouldn’t pull through with it. 

o   Commentary 2: if there would be more complaints about dating someone, then there would be a law, but nobody has a problem, it would just be good to have a relationship with someone that’s 2 or 3 years above or below you because there would never be any doubt in anyone else’s mind about someone dating above or below them that would be 5 or 6 years above or below them.

Reason 2:  

·         There are more relationships that is better than someone being more than 3 years older or younger than them.

o   Commentary 1: those types of relationships usually fail more than the other being 2 or 3 years above or below them.

o   Commentary 2: it would make it easier, and more reasonable.

Opposing claim:

·         I don’t think that this would be right, beczuse of all the failed relationships in the world.

Rebuttal:

·         May be true, but if you ask them if that person was good to them, then I can almost bet 9 chances out of 10, the person would say that the relationship was better than the other’s.

My thinking:

·         Nobody cant say that being 2 or 3 years above or below their significant other that their relationships fail all the time, there has to be someone out there that has this same reasoning and thinks the same way anyone would if they believed this.